SITUA     2002; 11 (21):

 

EVALUACIÓN FUNCIONAL Y NIVEL DE AUTONOMÍA EN EL PACIENTE AMBULATORIO DE EDAD AVANZADA

 

REFERENCIA BIBLIOGRÁFICA

1. Altimir S, Cervera AM. Aspectos diagnósticos y terapéuticos específicos del paciente anciano. En Rozman C, ed. Farreras-Rozman Medicina Interna, 14a ed., Madrid: Harcourt, 2000; 1: 1491-1497.

2. Gil P. Problemas clínicos más relevantes en el paciente geriátrico. En Rozman C, ed. Farreras-Rozman Medicina Interna, 14a ed., Madrid: Harcourt, 2000; 1: 1498-1511.

3. Varela LF, Sillicani A, Chávez H, y cols. Valoración geriátrica integral: propuesta de addendum a la historia clínica. Diagnóstico 2000; 39: 135-147.

4. Cid J, Damián J. Valoración de la discapacidad física: el índice de Barthel. Rev Esp Salud Pub 2000; 4: 125-132.

5. Gamarra P, Gomez M, Herrera N. Functional assessment of the hospitalized elderly patient. Prog abst. 24th ICIM Lima-Perú 1998; 1: 104.

6. Segovia V, Gamarra P. Profile of patients older than 60 hospitalized at an internal medicine service. Prog abst. 24th ICIM Lima-Perú 1998; 1: 104.

7. Villar M, León L. Older adults morbimortality health cared at home. Prog abst. 24th ICIM Lima-Perú 1998; 1: 104.

8. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al. Orientation in the acute and chronic stroke patient: impact on ADL and social activities. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 336-339.

9. Stone SP, Ali B, Auberleek I, et al. The Barthel Index in clinical practice: use on a rehabilitation ward for elderly people. J Roy Coll Phys Lond 1998; 28: 419-423.

10. Perlado F, Alastuey C, Espinosa C y cols. Valoración del estado funcional en ancianos hospitalizados: la escala de Plutchik. Med Clin (Barc) 1998; 107: 45-49.

11. Korner N, Wood S. Barthel Index information elicited over the telephone. Is it reliable? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 74: 9-18.

12. Feinstein AR, Josephy BR, Wells CK. Scientific and clinical problems in indexes of functional disability. Ann Intern Med 1986; 105: 413-420.

13. Guralnik JM, Fried LP, Salive ME. Disability as a public health outcome in the aging population. Annu Rev Public Health 1996; 17: 25-46.

14. Benítez MA, Vázquez JR. Valoración del grado de autonomía de los ancianos. Aten Primaria 1992; 10: 888-891.

15. Applegate WB, Blass JP, Williams TF. Instruments for the functional assessment of older patients. N Eng J Med 1990; 322: 1207-1214.

16. Ware JE. The status of health assessment 1994. Annu Rev Public Health 1995; 16: 327-354.

17. Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. N Eng J Med 1996; 334: 835-840.

18. Wylie CM. Measuring end results of rehabilitation of patients with stroke. Public Health Rep 1967; 82: 893-898.

19. Gresham GE, Philips TF, Labi MLC. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1980; 61: 355-358.

20. Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.

21. Mahoney FI, Wood OH, Barthel DW. Rehabilitation of chronically ill patients: the influence of complications on the final goal. South Med J 1958; 51: 605-609.

22. Wylie CM, White BK. A measure of disability. Arch Environ Health 1964; 8: 834-839.

23. Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Improving the sensitivity of the Barthel Index for stroke rehabilitation. J Clin Epidemiol 1989; 42: 703-709.

24. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, et al. The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 61-63.

25. Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL Index: a standard measure of physical disability? Int Disabil Studies 1988; 10: 64-67.

26. Medical Outcomes Trust. Instrument review criteria. Medical Outcomes Trust Bull 1995; (Sep): 1-4.

27. Granger CV, Dewis LS, Peters NC, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: analysis of repeated Barthel Index measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 14-17.

28. Granger CV, Albrecht GL, Hamilton BB. Outcome of comprehensive medical rehabilitation: measurement by PULSES Profile and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1979; 60: 145-154.

29. Jacelon CS. The Barthel Index and other indices of functional ability. Rehabil Nursing 1986; 11: 9-11.

30. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE, et al. The Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome Study: part II. Relative merits of the total Barthel Index score and a form-item subscore in predicting patients outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 100-103.

31. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Gresham GE. The Stroke Rehabilitation Outcome Study: part I. General description. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 506-509.

32. McGinnis GE, Seward ML, DeJong G, et al. Program evaluation of physical medicine and rehabilitation departments using self-report Barthel. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 123-125.

33. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the Modified Motor Assessment scale and the Barthel Index. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1077-1081.

34. Collin C, Davis S, Horne V, et al. Reliability of the Barthel ADL Index. Int J Rehab Res 1987; 10: 356-357.

35. Roy CW, Togneri J, Hay E, et al. An inter-rater reliability study of the Barthel Index. Int J Rehabil Res 1988; 11:67-70.

36. Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. A comparision of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age ageing 1995; 24: 54-57.

37. Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-182.

38. van Bennekom CAM, Jelles F, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Responsiveness of the Rehabilitation Activities Profile and the Barthel Index. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 39-44.

39. Dorevitch MI, Cossar RM, Bailey FJ, et al. The accuracy of self and informant ratings of physical functional capacity in the elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1992; 45: 791-798.

40. Magaziner J, Bassett SS, Hebel JR, et al. Use of proxies to measure health and functional status in epidemiologic studies of community dwelling women aged 65 years and older. Am J Epidemiol 1996; 143: 283-292.

41. Korner N, Wood S, Siemiatycki J, et al. Health related information postdischarge: telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1994; 75: 1287-1296.

42. Baztán JJ, Pérez del Molino J, Alarcón T, y cols. Indice de Barthel: Instrumento válido para la valoración funcional de pacientes con enfermedad cerebrovascular. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 1993; 28: 32-40.

43. Jitapunkul S, Kamolratanakul P, Ebrahim S. The meaning of activities of daily living in a thai elderly population: development of a new index. Age Ageing 1994; 23: 97-101.

44. Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, et al. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcome: the impact of age. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41:173-177.

45. Fortinsky RH, Granger CV, Seltzer GB. The use of functional assessment in understanding home care needs. Med Care 1981; 19: 489-497.

46. Alarcón MT, González JI, Bárcena A, y cols. Características del "paciente geriátrico" al ingreso en la unidad de agudos de un servicio de geriatría. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol 1993; 28: 285-290.

47. Trust Study Group. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nimodipine in acute stroke. Lancet 1990; 336: 1205-1209.

48. Rockwood K, Stolee P, Fox RA. Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1113-1118.

49. Guyatt GH, Eagle DJ, Sackett B et al. Measuring quality of life in the frail elderly. J Clin Epidemiol 1993; 46: 1433-1444.

50. Pound P, Gompertz P, Ebrahim S. Development and results of a questionnaire to measure carer satisfaction after stroke. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47: 500-505.

51. Nikolaus T, Bach M, Specht-Leible N et al. The Timed Test of Money Counting: a short physical performance test for manual dexterity and cognitive capacity. Age Ageing 1995; 24: 257-258.

52. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 1991; 39: 142-148.

53. Roden JA, Britton M, Gustafsson C et al. Validation of four scales for the acute stage of stroke. J Intern Med 1994; 236: 125-36.

54. Roda C, Climent JM, Serralta I y cols. Comparación entre la utilidad de una escala de valoración funcional y un perfil de salud en una muestra de pacientes hemipléjicos. Rehabilitación 1993; 27: 340-342.

55. Rothman ML, Hedrick S, Inui T. The Sickness Impact Profile as a measure of the health status of noncognitively impaired nursing home residents. Med Care 1989; 27: S157-S167.

56. Gloth FM, Waltson J, Meyer J et al. Reliability and validity of the Frail Elderly Functional Asessment Questionnaire. Am J Phys Med Rehab 1995; 74: 45-53.

57. Guralnik JM, Simonsick EM. Physical disability in older americans. J Gerontol 1993; 48 (special issue): 3-10.


Regresar al Artículo


back.gif (71 bytes) Contenido

Volumenes anteriores